Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) says he wishes that former National Security Advisor John Bolton had testified before the House during the impeachment proceeding to discuss his allegations and be cross-examined.

However, he says Bolton did not want to testify because he wanted to ā€œmonetizeā€ his security clearance by detailing, as he says, President Donald Trump’s illegal behavior.

In an interview on ABC’s ā€œThis Weekā€ on Sunday, Scott said, ā€œI do wish that Mr. Bolton would have come in to the House under oath and testified.ā€

ā€œOne of the things about making allegations in a book for $29.95 — certainly going to be a best seller for sure — the problem is that when you’re selling it in a book, you’re not putting yourself in a position to be cross-examined,ā€ he continued.

ā€œSo for $29.95, he can monetize his national security clearance. But under oath, he would have had an opportunity to answer questions and not just make assertions,ā€ he added.

Scott asserted that it ā€œwould have been goodā€ for Bolton to testify before the House to reveal details of ā€œfact patterns.ā€

ā€œSo far, it looks like he’s monetized it, more than he has actually provided a fact pattern,ā€ Scott said.

Advertisement

Watch the video below:Ā 

Bolton’s memoir ā€œThe Room Where It Happenedā€ is set to be released on June 23, and has received criticism from Republicans and Democrats.

The publisher of the book says that Bolton shows that ā€œTrump’s Ukraine-like transgressions existed across the full range of his foreign policy.ā€

House Intelligence Committee ChairĀ Adam SchiffĀ (D-Calif.) blasted Bolton for not testifying before House during the impeachment process, but putting recording criminal and impeachable activity in his book, asĀ IJR reported.

ā€œWhen Bolton was asked, he refused, and said he’d sue if subpoenaed,ā€ Schiff said in a tweet last week. ā€œInstead, he saved it for a book.ā€

ā€œBolton may be an author, but he’s no patriot,ā€ he added.